Harper v. Poway Unified School District
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
445 F.3d 1166 (2006)
- Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD
Facts
In 2003, the Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA) at Poway High School held a Day of Silence event to promote tolerance for people of different sexual orientations. A series of incidents and altercations between students erupted because of homophobic comments. A week later, students held a Straight-Pride Day, during which some wore T-shirts that had derogatory remarks about homosexuality, and more physical altercations occurred. The GSA held another Day of Silence in 2004, to which Tyler Harper (plaintiff) wore a T-shirt that said, “I WILL NOT ACCEPT WHAT GOD HAS CONDEMNED” and “HOMOSEXUALITY IS SHAMEFUL.” The next day Harper wore the same shirt except the front said, “BE ASHAMED, OUR SCHOOL EMBRACED WHAT GOD HAS CONDEMNED.” LeMaster, Harper’s second-period teacher, noticed the T-shirt and told Harper to remove the shirt because it was a school-dress-code violation. Harper refused and LeMaster sent him to the administrator with a dress-code-violation card. The assistant principal told Harper that Harper could return to class if he removed the T-shirt, but Harper refused. Harper remained in the front office for the remainder of the school day, but he was not suspended or disciplined. Harper sued the Poway Unified School District (defendant), alleging that the school had violated his First Amendment right to free speech. The district court denied Harper’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Harper filed an interlocutory appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Reinhardt, J.)
Dissent (Kozinski, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.