Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation
United States Supreme Court
509 U.S. 86 (1993)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
In Davis v. Michigan Department of Treasury, 489 U.S. 803 (1989), the United States Supreme Court held that a state violates the doctrine of intergovernmental tax immunity if it taxes federal retirement benefits but exempts state or local retirement benefits from taxation. Prior to Davis, Virginia (defendant) had a law that taxed federal retirement benefits but exempted state and local retirement benefits. After Davis was decided, a group of federal civil service and military retirees (the federal retirees) (plaintiffs) sought a refund of taxes paid on retirement benefits. A state trial court denied the federal retirees’ request. In doing so, the trial court applied the factors from Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97 (1971), and determined that prospective application of Davis would not affect its future operation and that retroactive application of Davis would result in inequity. The Virginia Supreme Court affirmed the trial court, holding that Davis should apply prospectively, not retroactively. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)
Concurrence (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.