Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation

509 U.S. 86 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation

United States Supreme Court
509 U.S. 86 (1993)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

In Davis v. Michigan Department of Treasury, 489 U.S. 803 (1989), the United States Supreme Court held that a state violates the doctrine of intergovernmental tax immunity if it taxes federal retirement benefits but exempts state or local retirement benefits from taxation. Prior to Davis, Virginia (defendant) had a law that taxed federal retirement benefits but exempted state and local retirement benefits. After Davis was decided, a group of federal civil service and military retirees (the federal retirees) (plaintiffs) sought a refund of taxes paid on retirement benefits. A state trial court denied the federal retirees’ request. In doing so, the trial court applied the factors from Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97 (1971), and determined that prospective application of Davis would not affect its future operation and that retroactive application of Davis would result in inequity. The Virginia Supreme Court affirmed the trial court, holding that Davis should apply prospectively, not retroactively. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)

Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)

Concurrence (Scalia, J.)

Dissent (O’Connor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership