Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Harrington v. Harrington

Supreme Court of Mississippi
648 So.2d 543 (1994)


A judgment of divorce between Mark and Donnett Harrington in Mississippi granted custody of the Harringtons’ two daughters to Donnett and awarded overnight-visitation rights to Mark on the first and third weekends of each month. One year later, Donnett filed a motion to modify the judgment, alleging a material change in circumstances that adversely affected the daughters. Specifically, Donnett claimed that Mark was living with his girlfriend, Stephanie Milam, outside of marriage. At a hearing, Donnett testified that one of the daughters had come home upset from a weekend at Mark’s residence and stated that Stephanie had yelled and cursed at them. Mark denied the claim and argued that Stephanie’s presence in his home did not confuse or upset his daughters. Mark did admit, however, that his daughters had asked him when he would marry Stephanie. The trial court held that, although Mark professed to be teaching his children Christian principles, Mark’s conduct was inconsistent with that claim due to the fact that he was living with a woman outside of marriage. The trial judge held that Mark could no longer have overnight visitation with the children and ordered that at no time could the daughters be in the presence of Stephanie or engaged in a discussion about Stephanie. Mark appealed, arguing that the trial court’s order was unreasonable.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence/Dissent (Lee, J.)

The concurrence/dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the judge’s concurrence in part and dissent in part.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.