Harrington v. Harrington
Texas Court of Appeals
742 S.W.2d 722 (1987)
- Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD
Facts
Brian Harrington (plaintiff) and M. Gay Harrington (defendant) lived together with their children in properties rented under both Brian’s and Gay’s names. After three years of renting these properties together, Brian and Gay became ceremonially married and decided to purchase a house. Brian and Gay searched for a house to purchase, and after deciding on a home they liked, both Brian and Gay attended the property’s real estate closing. At the closing, the title to the property was placed in Brian’s name only for credit and convenience purposes because Gay was quitting her job to attend law school full-time. Both parties referred to the property as our home. After the parties sought and received a judicial divorce, the trial court awarded Brian and Gay equal undivided interests in the house as tenants in common. The trial court found that although the title to the property was placed in only Brian’s name, the parties conduct showed that an oral partnership existed and that the parties intended for the home to be owned, used, and enjoyed by both parties. The court found that both parties wanted to purchase the home to raise their children and both Brian and Gay contributed financially to the home’s repairs and improvements. Brian appealed, arguing the court unconstitutionally divested him of his separate property that was obtained before he was married to Gay. Brian also argued there was no evidence of an oral partnership.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Duggan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.