Harrington v. Taylor
Supreme Court of North Carolina
36 S.E.2d. 227 (1945)
Taylor (defendant) assaulted his wife. His wife sought safety in Harrington’s (plaintiff) house. The next day, Taylor entered Harrington’s house and began assaulting his wife again. Taylor’s wife knocked him to the ground and was about to strike him with an axe when Harrington intervened. Harrington moved between Taylor and his wife, and instead of hitting her husband with the axe, Taylor’s wife struck Harrington’s hand. Harrington suffered severe injury. Taylor orally promised to pay Harrington for her damages. He then paid a small amount to Harrington, but refused to pay more. Harrington brought suit against Taylor in North Carolina state court seeking to enforce the promise to pay for the remainder of her damages. Taylor’s demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and Harrington appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 153,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,400 briefs, keyed to 183 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.