Logourl black

Harrington v. Vandalia-Butler Board of Education

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
649 F.2d 434 (1981)


Facts

In a prior action, Jeanne Harrington (plaintiff) brought suit against the Vandalia-Butler Board of Education (Board of Education) (defendant) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio for discrimination in former employment. Harrington sought relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). At trial, judgment was entered in favor of Harrington and she was awarded compensatory damages. The Board of Education appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The court sustained the finding of discrimination, but reversed the judgment on the grounds that Title VII does not authorize compensatory damages. While Harrington’s appeal was pending, the Supreme Court decided Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978). That decision overruled Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961), and effectuated a change in the law, making municipalities subject to liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. As a result of this change in the law, Harrington brought this action against the Board of Education, alleging discrimination and seeking relief under § 1983. The Board of Education moved for summary judgment on the grounds that Harrington’s claim was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. The district court granted the Board of Education’s motion for summary judgment, and Harrington appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Martin, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 81,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 11,513 briefs - keyed to 153 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now