From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...
Harris v. Balk
United States Supreme Court
198 U.S. 215 (1905)
Balk (plaintiff), a resident of North Carolina, owed $344 to Epstein, a resident of Maryland. Harris (defendant), also a resident of North Carolina, owed $180 to Balk. While Harris was travelling to Baltimore, Maryland, he was served with a writ of attachment from Epstein for the debt that he owed to Balk. After returning to North Carolina, Harris consented to the attachment. Shortly after this consent, Balk sued Harris in North Carolina state court for the $180. Harris argued that he had already paid the debt and that the Maryland judgment was entitled to full faith and credit by the North Carolina court. The North Carolina state courts held for Balk, finding that the judgment was not entitled to full faith and credit given that Harris was only temporarily in Maryland.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Peckham, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.