Harris v. Blockbuster Inc.

622 F.Supp.2d 396 (2009)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Harris v. Blockbuster Inc.

United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
622 F.Supp.2d 396 (2009)

  • Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Play video

Facts

Blockbuster Inc. (defendant) was a movie-rental company. Blockbuster customers could rent movies over the internet through Blockbuster’s streaming service, Blockbuster Online. Blockbuster entered into an agreement with Facebook, a social-media company, by which Facebook would automatically share the rental choices of Blockbuster Online customers with their Facebook friends. The Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA), 18 U.S.C. § 2710, prohibited a video-rental company from disclosing personal information about its customers without their written consent. Cathryn Harris (plaintiff), a Blockbuster Online customer, sued Blockbuster for violating the VPPA. Prior to using Blockbuster Online’s services, customers were required to check a box indicating that they understood Blockbuster Online’s terms and conditions. These terms and conditions included a dispute-resolution clause stating that all claims would be referred to arbitration. Additionally, Blockbuster could modify the terms and conditions at its sole discretion and at any time, without notice, and effective immediately. Blockbuster moved to enforce this arbitration clause against Harris. Harris argued that Blockbuster’s arbitration clause was unenforceable because it was illusory and unconscionable.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lynn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership