Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
322 S.E.2d 854 (W. Va. 1984)
The Crowders (defendants), as husband and wife, were joint owners of a piece of land. The husband was subject to several judgment liens. One of Mr. Crowder’s creditors, Harris (plaintiff), filed suit to sell the property to enforce his lien (the property could not be partitioned in kind). Mrs. Crowder moved to dismiss the action. The trial court then certified to the state supreme court the question of whether a judgment lien creditor could force a judicial sale of jointly-held property when the judgment was against only one of the joint property owners.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Neely, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 237,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.