Harrison v. Benchmark Electronics Huntsville, Inc.

593 F.3d 1206 (2010)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Harrison v. Benchmark Electronics Huntsville, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
593 F.3d 1206 (2010)

SR
Play video

Facts

John Harrison (plaintiff) began working as a temporary employee at Benchmark Electronics Huntsville, Inc. (BEHI) (defendant), in November 2005. Harrison’s supervisor, Don Anthony, encouraged Harrison to apply for a permanent position at BEHI. On May 19, 2006, Harrison submitted an application and took a routine preemployment drug test. Harrison tested positive for barbiturates. Anthony learned of the positive testing and questioned Harrison about the results. Harrison informed Anthony that he had a prescription for the barbiturates. Anthony had Harrison provide information regarding the prescription to a medical-review officer (MRO) over the phone while Anthony remained in the room. Harrison disclosed to the MRO that he took barbiturates to control his epilepsy. Anthony subsequently instructed BEHI’s human-resources department not to offer Harrison the job. On May 3, 2007, Harrison sued BEHI in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, claiming that BEHI had made a preemployment medical inquiry prohibited by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12112. The district court granted BEHI summary judgment, based in part on the ground that BEHI was entitled to ask follow-up questions after Harrison’s positive drug test to determine whether Harrison had a legitimate reason to take barbiturates. Harrison appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Siler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 736,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership