Harshey v. Advanced Bionics Corp.

No. 1:09-cv-905-DFH-TAB, 2009 WL 3617756 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Harshey v. Advanced Bionics Corp.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
No. 1:09-cv-905-DFH-TAB, 2009 WL 3617756 (2009)

SH

Facts

Advanced Bionics Corp. (defendant) manufactures pulse generators. Kenneth A. Harshey (plaintiff) had one of these pulse generators surgically implanted. Harshey brought suit against Bionics Corp. after the device malfunctioned and left Harshey with severe and permanent injuries. Harshey’s wife and son each joined as plaintiffs to the case, claiming loss of consortium and negligent infliction of emotion distress, respectively. The case was originally filed in state court, and Bionics Corp. removed the case to federal court by invoking diversity jurisdiction. All three plaintiffs filed a motion to remand the case to state court for failure to show that the jurisdictional amount was satisfied. Plaintiffs submitted post-removal stipulations stating that none of them individually sought, demanded, or would accept any recovery in excess of $75,000. To meet its burden of establishing that federal jurisdiction was proper, Bionics Corp. relied on the statement of its counsel that its experience with personal-injury litigation and the general descriptions of the Harsheys’ alleged injuries showed that the amount-in-controversy requirement was satisfied.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership