Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Harte v. Hand

Superior Court of New Jersey
81 A.3d 667 (N.J. Super. 2013)


Facts

David Hand (defendant) was divorced from T.B. (plaintiff) and was ordered to pay child support for their daughter. Hand then married Susan Harte (plaintiff), and they had a son. During the marriage, Hand was seriously injured during his employment and received a $1,200,000 settlement with net proceeds of approximately $533,822. After the settlement, Hand agreed to an imputation of $57,200 in annual income when recalculating child support for T.B. Subsequently, Hand and Harte were divorced. At the time of the divorce decree, Hand again consented to the imputation of $57,200 in annual income when calculating child support for Harte. Hand then married another woman. Hand filed a motion to reduce child support for both children, claiming that he was unable to pay the child-support amounts based upon the agreed-to imputed income. The trial court denied Hand’s motion but noted that it would reconsider the motion if Hand presented a vocational expert to substantiate Hand’s lack of ability to earn the amount of imputed income. Later, Hand filed a motion for reconsideration to reduce his child support and supplied a report from a vocational expert, indicating Hand’s inability to earn the imputed-income amount. The trial court instead calculated the child-support obligations to T.B. and Harte based on the individual financial circumstances of the mothers, as provided for in the child-support guidelines. Hand appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Koblitz, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.