Harter v. Iowa Grain Co.

220 F.3d 544 (2000)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Harter v. Iowa Grain Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
220 F.3d 544 (2000)

EP

Facts

Lowell Harter (plaintiff), a farmer, entered hedge-to-arrive (HTA) contracts with The Andersons (Andersons), a grain elevator company, for delivery of corn. The contracts included an arbitration provision for disputes to be resolved by the National Grain & Feed Association (NGFA). On the agreed delivery date, commodity prices changed in favor of Andersons. Andersons sought delivery of the corn, or cash equivalent, and payment for the price difference from Harter. Harter refused, claiming he was told there was no risk of price fluctuations. Andersons claimed that the risk of loss was apparent in the transaction based on the difference between the contract price and future market price. Harter sued in district court, alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and the Commodity Exchange Act and bringing fraud and contract claims. Andersons’s motion to compel arbitration was granted. The NGFA entered an award in favor of Andersons. Harter moved to vacate the award, arguing that the NGFA was structurally biased against farmers and impartial because its members included grain elevators, employees of Andersons, and HTA drafters. Andersons moved to confirm the award. The district court confirmed the award, and Harter appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cudahy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership