Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California
United States Supreme Court
509 U.S. 764 (1993)
Hartford Fire Insurance Co. (Hartford) (defendant) was charged by California (plaintiff) with violating the Sherman Act’s antitrust provisions by agreeing to restrict the terms of coverage of commercial general liability insurance available in the United States. Hartford was a London, England insurer, and its conduct occurred only in the United Kingdom. In its defense, Hartford argued that it was unreasonable for U.S. antitrust laws to regulate its conduct. The district court noted that it had jurisdiction over California’s Sherman Act claims against Hartford, and held Hartford liable for antitrust violations. Hartford appealed, arguing that the district court should have declined to exercise its jurisdiction over the case due to principles of international comity. The court of appeals accepted Hartford’s argument that when a conflict between international and domestic laws exists, American courts should respect principles of international comity and decline to exercise jurisdiction unless other factors weigh in favor of exercising jurisdiction. It found that such factors were present in Hartford’s case, including Hartford’s express purpose to affect United States commerce and the substantial nature of the effect produced. The court of appeals held that these factors outweighed the potential conflict between domestic and international laws and supported the court’s exercise of jurisdiction over the litigation. Hartford appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 723,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 723,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.