Haslem v. Lockwood
Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut
37 Conn. 500 (1871)
The plaintiff hired two men to gather manure left by travelers’ horses on the side of the public highway, intending to remove the manure to the plaintiff’s land the next evening. The two men took two hours to gather the manure into eighteen heaps and left the heaps by the roadside overnight. The next morning, the defendant saw the manure heaps, asked the borough warden if he had given permission for anyone to remove them and learned the warden had not, and took the heaps to the defendant’s own land. The plaintiff sued and the trial court found the plaintiff had not made out a sufficient right or interest in the manure heaps. The plaintiff appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Park, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.