Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Hastings State Bank v. Stalnaker, Trustee

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit
431 B.R. 459 (2010)


Facts

EDM Corporation (EDM) (defendant) was incorporated in Nebraska. EDM’s official organizational name of record was listed with the Nebraska secretary of state (secretary) as EDM Corporation. However, EDM was also known throughout the industry by its unregistered trade name, EDM Equipment. EDM obtained loans from various entities, including Hastings State Bank (Hastings) (plaintiff), TierOne Bank (TierOne) (defendant), and Huntington National Bank (Huntington) (defendant). The loans were secured by property owned by EDM, including an ambulance. Hastings filed a financing statement with the secretary in an attempt to perfect its security interest in the ambulance. In the financing statement, Hastings identified EDM as “EDM Corporation d/b/a EDM Equipment.” Thereafter, TierOne and Huntington filed financing statements identifying EDM only as “EDM Corporation.” A record search using the secretary’s standard search logic and EDM’s proper organizational name yielded results for TierOne’s and Huntington’s statements, but not Hastings’s statement. After EDM filed for bankruptcy, Hastings brought an adversary proceeding to determine the validity of the liens in EDM’s property. The bankruptcy court concluded that Hastings’s financing statement for the ambulance insufficiently identified EDM as the debtor, resulting in a seriously misleading filing. As a result, the bankruptcy court held that TierOne’s and Huntington’s interests in the ambulance took priority over Hastings’s interest, despite Hastings’s earlier filing. Hastings appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Federman, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.