Hatchard v. Mege
England and Wales High Court of Justice
(1887) 18 Q.B.D. 771 (1887)
- Written by Sarah Hoffman, JD
Facts
A wine merchant (plaintiff) imported Delmonico brand champagne into England from France. Messrs. Delback & Co. (Delback) (defendant) published a notice saying that the champagne sold by the wine merchant was not authentic Delmonico brand champagne and that the wine merchant was fraudulently using the trademark. The wine merchant filed suit for libel against Delback. At the end of the trial court proceedings, the wine merchant died. The court ordered that the case continue, with the executrix of the wine merchant’s estate taking over as the plaintiff. The court then entered a nonsuit on the grounds that the plaintiff’s claims had ended when the original plaintiff died. The executrix appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Day, J.)
Concurrence (Willis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.