Hatley v. Stafford

588 P.2d 603 (1978)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hatley v. Stafford

Oregon Supreme Court
588 P.2d 603 (1978)

SC
Play video

Facts

Stafford Farms (Stafford) (defendant) leased its property to Mike Hatley (plaintiff) for about ten months for the purpose of growing wheat. The agreement contained a buyout provision, under which Stafford could buy out Hatley at a price of not more than $70 per acre. Nearly seven months into the lease, Stafford took possession of the farm and cut the wheat crop, claiming it was exercising its buyout option. The fair market value of the wheat at the time was $400 per acre. Hatley brought suit for trespass, alleging that the parties had orally agreed that the buyout provision was only to apply for a period of 30 to 60 days after the execution of the lease. The restriction on the buyout provision was not contained in the handwritten agreement which was drafted by the parties. Stafford objected to the introduction of this alleged oral agreement on the basis of the parol evidence rule. The trial court allowed the evidence to be admitted under the partial integration doctrine. Stafford appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Howell, J.)

Dissent

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership