Hatton v. United Kingdom

App. No. 36022/97, Eur. Ct. H.R. 2003-VIII (2003)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 43,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hatton v. United Kingdom

European Court of Human Rights

App. No. 36022/97, Eur. Ct. H.R. 2003-VIII (2003)

Facts

Ruth Hatton (plaintiff) lived near Heathrow Airport. Hatton’s sleep was severely disturbed by the noise caused by planes landing at night. In 1993, the United Kingdom (defendant) introduced a policy regarding night flights based on a 1992 study that found that only about two to three percent of the nearby population was sensitive enough to be affected by flight noise. Hatton brought an action against the United Kingdom, alleging that the 1993 policy increased the nighttime noise by allowing more flights, thus violating Hatton’s Article 8 right to respect for private and family life under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The United Kingdom justified its policy by citing the economic interests of airline operators and the economic interests of the entire country. The United Kingdom also pointed out that house prices in Hatton’s area had not declined due to the noise, and therefore, she was financially able to relocate, which Hatton did in 1997.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wildhaber, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 688,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 688,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 43,000 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 688,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 43,000 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership