Havilah Real Property Services, LLC v. VLK, LLC
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
108 A.3d 334 (2015)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Vicky Lynn Karen and LaMar Carlson were former romantic partners who formed VLK, LLC (defendant), a company that resold for profit distressed houses in Washington, D.C. After his romantic relationship with Karen ended, Carlson began a romantic relationship with Joan Alderman, owner of Havilah Real Property Services, LLC (plaintiff). Havilah was a competitor of VLK. VLK sued Havilah, alleging that Carlson had wrongfully transferred $10,000 from VLK to Havilah to buy properties. In connection with the suit, VLK filed lis pendens on 51 of Havilah’s properties in D.C. A lis pendens is a document recorded in a county’s real property records that gives notice of pending litigation concerning a property. A lis pendens filing greatly increases the difficulty of selling a property due to the potential risks to buyers. The lawsuit was resolved, and VLK released the lis pendens. Havilah subsequently brought a separate suit against VLK, arguing that it had filed the lis pendens with an improper motive and that VLK had tortiously interfered with the sales of 31 of the 51 properties covered by the filings. Evidence showed that Havilah had successfully sold all of its properties until the lis pendens were filed. Evidence also showed that Havilah actively marketed all 31 of the properties in question, developing genuine purchaser interest in the properties and securing contracts to sell several of them prior to the filings. After the filings, the sales contracts fell through, and Havilah was unable to sell any of the properties. A jury found for Havilah and awarded $602,942 in damages. VLK appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Blackburne-Rigsby, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.