Havlicek v. Coast-to-Coast Analytical Services, Inc.

39 Cal. App. 4th 1844, 46 Cal. Rptr. 2d 696 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Havlicek v. Coast-to-Coast Analytical Services, Inc.

California Court of Appeal
39 Cal. App. 4th 1844, 46 Cal. Rptr. 2d 696 (1995)

Facts

Coast-to-Coast Analytical Services, Inc. (CCAS) (defendant) was incorporated in Delaware but had no other Delaware contacts. CCAS was headquartered in California and did business and employed people there. Mary and Stephen Havlicek (plaintiffs) were two of CCAS’s five directors. After CCAS announced its intent to merge with other companies, the Havliceks, who opposed the merger, demanded access to a broad swath of company documents. CCAS limited the Havliceks’ document access based on its concern that the Havliceks would use CCAS documents to start a competing business. The Havliceks, who unsuccessfully sued to stop the merger, also requested an order allowing them to inspect CCAS’s documents. Per the Havliceks, California law gave them an absolute right to do so. CCAS responded that Delaware law applied because CCAS was incorporated in Delaware and that under Delaware law (1) the Havliceks were entitled to inspect documents only for a purpose reasonably related to their director positions and (2) the Delaware Chancery Court had exclusive jurisdiction to enforce inspection rights. Concluding that Delaware law applied, the trial court ruled that it did not have jurisdiction and denied the Havliceks’ request. The Havliceks appealed. CCAS responded that Delaware law should apply due to the internal-affairs doctrine and the United States Constitution’s Commerce and Full Faith and Credit clauses.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Yegan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership