Logourl black
From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...

Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff

United States Supreme Court
467 U.S. 229 (1984)


Facts

In the 1960s, the Hawaii Legislature discovered that, while the state and federal governments owned almost forty-nine percent of the state’s land, another forty-seven percent was owned by only seventy-two private landowners. Disturbed by this oligopoly of land ownership, and recognizing that the system inflated land prices and harmed the general public, the Hawaiian Legislature passed the Land Reform Act of 1967 and attempted to use its eminent domain powers to seize land from these seventy-two private landowner lessors and redistribute it more evenly among the general population of private lessees. The Legislature recognized that this was a taking of private property, and thus incorporated a provision to pay just compensation to the private lessors. In practice, funds to satisfy condemnation awards were supplied entirely by lessees. Rather than comply with this regulatory scheme and receive compensation, Midkiff and other landowners (plaintiffs) filed suit in federal district court on the grounds that the Act was unconstitutional. The district court denied their application for an injunction, but the court of appeals reversed on the grounds that the Act violated the “public use” requirement of the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause. The Hawaii Housing Authority (defendant) appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 136,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.