Hayes v. Eateries, Inc.

905 P.2d 778 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hayes v. Eateries, Inc.

Oklahoma Supreme Court
905 P.2d 778 (1995)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD
Play video

Facts

John Hayes (plaintiff) was promoted to assistant manager after working for Stillwater Garfield’s (defendant) for a couple of years. Hayes was to be employed indefinitely and had no employment contract. Soon after Hayes was promoted, Stillwater Garfield’s terminated Hayes even though he had no issues with performance of his job duties. Hayes asserted that he was discharged because he confronted his manager about theft of property and embezzlement that Hayes had been investigating. The manager was eventually convicted of multiple counts of embezzlement from Stillwater Garfield’s. Hayes filed a petition in the trial court, claiming breach of contract and the tort of wrongful discharge. The trial court dismissed Hayes’s petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Hayes appealed to the appellate court, which affirmed the trial court judgment. Hayes appealed to the Oklahoma Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lavender, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership