Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division
646 N.Y.S.2d 315 (1996)
Gail Haymes (plaintiff) and Stephen Haymes (defendant) lived together as husband and wife from 1965 to 1987. According to Mrs. Haymes, Mr. Haymes refused to have sex with her beginning in late 1984. In 1987, he moved out of the couple’s home, allegedly without justification or her consent. He was also alleged to have committed adultery with a number of women. In September 1988, Mrs. Haymes filed for divorce on the grounds of abandonment. From November 18, 1988 to January 4, 1989, the couple attempted to reconcile. They lived together and had sex at least once, although Mrs. Haymes stated that Mr. Haymes did not show her any affection or apologize for his adultery. They again separated, and Mr. Haymes then countersued for divorce. On the eve of trial in 1995, Mr. Haymes moved for summary judgment on the grounds that the couple’s reconciliation precluded Mrs. Haymes’s claim of abandonment. The trial court granted judgment to Mr. Haymes. Mrs. Haymes appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Mazzarelli, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 239,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.