Logourl black
From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...

Haymond v. Lundy

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
2002 WL 1972101


Facts

John Haymond (plaintiff), Robert Hochberg, and Marvin Lundy (defendant) founded the law firm partnership Haymond & Lundy (H&L) in October 1997. The partnership agreement provided that a partner must get the approval of a majority of the partners before purchasing or disposing of a material asset exceeding $10,000 in value. John Kelly was injured in an accident. He initially retained attorney Emmett Fitzpatrick to represent him in a personal injury action. After Fitzpatrick filed the complaint, Kelly said he no longer wanted Fitzpatrick’s services and turned to Lundy and H&L instead. Without consulting the other partners, Lundy contacted Fitzpatrick and promised to pay a referral fee out of any trial proceeds. The case settled for nearly $2.5 million, including attorney’s fees of $996,500. In satisfaction of their referral agreement, Lundy paid Fitzpatrick $150,000. H&L dissolved in October 1999. The partners’ various liabilities regarding partnership business were ultimately sorted out in court. Haymond and Hochberg alleged that the referral fee was not a liability of the partnership because Lundy lacked authority to pay it without majority approval. Lundy countered that the referral fee was not a material asset. No evidence of the firm’s prior treatment of referral fees was presented.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Shapiro, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 136,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.