Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Haywood v. Drown

United States Supreme Court
556 U.S. 729 (2009)


Facts

Keith Haywood (plaintiff) was a prison inmate in a New York correctional facility, who brought two civil rights actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Curtis Drown (defendant) and other corrections officers, seeking punitive damages and attorney’s fees. Haywood acted pro se and filed the claims in the New York State Supreme Court, which dismissed the claims for lack of jurisdiction, pursuant to New York Correctional Law § 24, directing that claims against corrections officers must be brought against the state in the court of claims. Under state law, plaintiffs in the court of claims must follow strict requirements and are not entitled to a jury trial, attorney’s fees, punitive damages, or injunctive relief. The intermediate appellate court and New York Court of Appeals affirmed. The court of appeals upheld the law as valid, because it treated state and federal law claims the same. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on the issue of whether the state’s handling of § 1983 claims against corrections officers violated the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Thomas, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.