Healy v. James
United States Supreme Court
408 U.S. 169 (1972)
Students (plaintiffs) attending Central Connecticut State College (CCSC) attempted to form a local chapter of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) in 1969. The national SDS organization was viewed by some as having a philosophy of violence and disruption. During this time, widespread civil disobedience was occurring on college campuses, including vandalism, arson, and the seizure of buildings. The SDS chapters at some colleges were a driving force behind the disruptions. The president of CCSC, Dr. James (defendant), denied recognition to the newly formed SDS chapter at CCSC. This denial of recognition resulted in the CCSC SDS chapter being unable to utilize campus facilities, use campus bulletin boards, or use the school newspaper. President James wrote an article explaining that he was unwilling to sanction an organization that openly advocates the destruction of ideals and academic freedoms. President James also issued a statement indicating that the SDS chapter would be a disruptive force on the campus. The students in the CCSC SDS chapter were ambiguous about how they would respond to issues of violence and whether they would interrupt a class, but they asserted their independence from the national organization and indicated they only shared some of the national organization’s beliefs. The plaintiffs sued President James for violating the plaintiffs’ First Amendment right to associate. The district court ruled that President James’s refusal to grant recognition to the SDS chapter did not violate the plaintiffs’ right to associate. The court of appeals affirmed the decision on alternative grounds. The plaintiffs petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.