Heath v. Craighill, Rendleman, Ingle & Blythe, P.A.

388 S.E.2d 178 (1990)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Heath v. Craighill, Rendleman, Ingle & Blythe, P.A.

North Carolina Court of Appeals
388 S.E.2d 178 (1990)

SC

Facts

Francis Clarkson and other attorneys at Craighill, Rendleman, Ingle & Blythe, P.A. (defendant) performed various legal services for Lee Heath (plaintiff). Clarkson made a series of recommendations of investments in various oil deals to Heath, promising at least a two-to-one return. Heath made the investments in exchange for promissory notes from Clarkson representing Clarkson’s promised rate of return. For example, Heath’s first investment was for $25,000, and Clarkson gave him a promissory note for $50,000. Around the same time, Clarkson resigned from Craighill. After the promissory notes became due, Clarkson wrote personal checks to Heath to cover the amounts. The checks bounced. Heath brought suit against Craighill, seeking to impose liability for his loss on Clarkson’s former law firm. Craighill’s charter did not provide for the firm’s handling of investments of its clients; the charter was limited to the provision of legal services. The jury returned a verdict for Heath. The trial court granted Craighill’s judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Heath appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cozart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership