Heath v. Craighill, Rendleman, Ingle & Blythe, P.A.
North Carolina Court of Appeals
388 S.E.2d 178 (1990)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Francis Clarkson and other attorneys at Craighill, Rendleman, Ingle & Blythe, P.A. (defendant) performed various legal services for Lee Heath (plaintiff). Clarkson made a series of recommendations of investments in various oil deals to Heath, promising at least a two-to-one return. Heath made the investments in exchange for promissory notes from Clarkson representing Clarkson’s promised rate of return. For example, Heath’s first investment was for $25,000, and Clarkson gave him a promissory note for $50,000. Around the same time, Clarkson resigned from Craighill. After the promissory notes became due, Clarkson wrote personal checks to Heath to cover the amounts. The checks bounced. Heath brought suit against Craighill, seeking to impose liability for his loss on Clarkson’s former law firm. Craighill’s charter did not provide for the firm’s handling of investments of its clients; the charter was limited to the provision of legal services. The jury returned a verdict for Heath. The trial court granted Craighill’s judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Heath appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cozart, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.