Heath v. Perdue Farms, Inc.

87 F. Supp. 2d 452 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Heath v. Perdue Farms, Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Maryland
87 F. Supp. 2d 452 (2000)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Perdue Farms, Incorporated (Perdue) (defendant) was a poultry company. Perdue’s operations required the use of chicken catchers (plaintiffs) to transport chickens from farms to its factory. Perdue exercised strict control over the chicken catchers’ work. Work was to be performed pursuant to Perdue’s live-haul instructional training manual. Perdue provided constant feedback about performance. The chicken-catching crews were not permitted to increase their output for extra pay or profit. Perdue owned and maintained all of the equipment used to catch chickens. Catching chickens for Perdue required little skill. Most members of the chicken-catching crews had long-term, exclusive relationships with Perdue. Perdue exercised tight control over the chicken catching because it was integral to its business. The chicken catchers worked more than 40 hours per week but were not paid overtime wages. Over 100 individuals who worked as chicken catchers brought an action against Perdue, seeking recovery of overtime pay as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and state wage laws. The chicken catchers filed a motion for summary judgment in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nickerson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership