Heckler v. Chaney
United States Supreme Court
470 U.S. 821, 105 S. Ct. 1649, 84 L. Ed. 2d 714 (1985)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Several states used various combinations of powerful drugs to carry out capital punishment by lethal injection. The federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had not approved using these drugs for human executions. Larry Leon Chaney and other death-row inmates from Texas and Oklahoma (collectively, the inmates) (plaintiffs) petitioned the FDA to bring enforcement actions against the states. The inmates claimed that states’ use of these drugs in lethal injections violated the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The FDA responded that it did not have jurisdiction to review the use of controlled substances in lethal injections and that even if it did, the agency elected not to do so. The inmates sued Secretary of Health and Human Services Margaret Heckler (defendant), seeking an order requiring the FDA to begin enforcement proceedings against the states. The district court dismissed the case. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed and ordered that the FDA begin an enforcement investigation. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
Concurrence (Brennan, J.)
Concurrence (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 798,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.