Hector Emilio Reyes-Cardona, et al. v. J.C. Penney Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
694 F.2d 894 (1982)

- Written by Whitney Waldenberg, JD
Facts
J. C. Penney Co. (defendant) filed a debt-collection suit in Puerto Rico against Hector L. Reyes-Diaz (Hector Jr.) and the woman who J. C. Penney believed to be his wife, Isabel Diaz de Reyes (Isabel) (plaintiff). However, Isabel was not Hector Jr.’s s wife; she was Hector Jr.’s mother. J. C. Penney wrongly assumed that Isabel was Hector Jr.’s wife based on the credit application submitted by Hector Jr., which identified Isabel as a person authorized to use his credit. As soon as J. C. Penney learned that Isabel was not Hector Jr.’s wife, J. C. Penney dismissed the suit. Isabel and her husband, Hector Emilio Reyes-Cardona (Hector Sr.) (plaintiff), subsequently filed a diversity action in United States federal district court, seeking damages against J. C. Penney. Isabel and Hector Sr. alleged that when Hector Sr. learned about the suit against Isabel, he had a mental breakdown and required emergency psychiatric intervention. J. C. Penney moved for summary judgment, admitting its error but arguing that its mistake did not give rise to liability for damages under the law of Puerto Rico. The district court agreed and granted summary judgment. Isabel and Hector Sr. appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.