Hector v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
2 Mo. 166 (1829)
Hector (defendant), a slave, was beaten most of the night when a group caught him and tried to compel him to confess to a recent burglary. At one point, Hector said that if they released him he would show them where the money was. Hours later, another man approached the group beating Hector and told Hector that if he took the money he should confess. Hector then confessed to the crime and led the whole group to his master’s house. The money was not found. The trial court allowed the jury to hear evidence concerning both of Hector’s confessions. The judge instructed the jury that the confessions they believed to be freely and voluntarily given should be considered as good evidence but the confessions they believed not to have been free or voluntary should be excluded from their consideration.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (M’Girk, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.