Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker Clinic
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
980 A.2d 1229 (2009)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Terry Hedgepeth (plaintiff) learned that his girlfriend was being treated for HIV and went to Whitman Walker Clinic (WWC) (defendant) to be tested. The intake worker mistakenly noted on the paperwork that Hedgepeth was HIV-positive. After Hedgepeth’s blood was tested, showing a negative result for HIV, WWC misinterpreted the test and noted Hedgepeth was HIV-positive on a Client Lab Results form. WWC then met with Hedgepeth and told him he was HIV-positive. For the next five years, Hedgepeth believed he was HIV-positive. Hedgepeth suffered from severe emotional distress, lost his job, suffered from an eating disorder, and used illegal drugs. Hedgepeth also had suicidal thoughts and was committed to psychiatric wards on two occasions. Hedgepeth also had sex with a woman he knew was HIV-positive. Hedgepeth was eventually tested at a different medical clinic and discovered he did not have HIV. Hedgepeth sued WWC for negligent infliction of emotional distress. WWC filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Hedgepeth was never exposed to a zone of physical danger. The trial court granted the motion, and Hedgepeth appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Concurrence (Ruiz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.