Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Hedrich v. Board of Regents

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
274 F.3d 1174 (2001)


Facts

Mary Anne Hedrich (plaintiff) was a tenure-track assistant professor in the Department of Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Coaching at the University of Wisconsin at Whitewater. The University denied Hedrich tenure based on her failure to meet the University’s standards of scholarship and her failure to submit relevant documentation for consideration by Department faculty. Shortly thereafter, the University advised Hedrich that the next academic year would be her last. Hedrich began seeking alternative academic employment and unsuccessfully applied for seven positions. Hedrich filed suit in Wisconsin state court against the Board of Regents (defendant) arguing that the University deprived her of her liberty interest in her good name and reputation without due process of law. The University removed the case to federal court and moved to dismiss. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the University. Hedrich appealed, arguing that the denial of her tenure deprived her of her liberty interest in seeking the career of her choosing in violation of her due process rights.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wood, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.