Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Heien v. North Carolina

United States Supreme Court
135 S. Ct. 530 (2014)


Facts

The State of North Carolina (plaintiff) prosecuted Nicholas Brady Heien (defendant) on drug charges related to cocaine that a police officer found in Heien's car. The officer had stopped the car for operating with only one of its two brake lights working. The officer believed this to violate state traffic laws. The trial judge denied Heien's motion to exclude the seized cocaine from evidence. Heien was convicted and appealed to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, which reversed the trial judge's ruling. The appellate court noted that the applicable North Carolina traffic law required only one working brake light, and therefore the police officer's initial traffic stop was unjustified. Without proper justification, the officer's search of Heien's car and seizure of the cocaine violated Heien's Fourth Amendment rights. The state appealed to the North Carolina Supreme Court, which reversed the appellate court on the grounds that the officer reasonably misinterpreted an ambiguously worded traffic law, and therefore a traffic stop based on that misinterpretation was justifiable. On remand, the appellate court affirmed the trial judge's evidentiary ruling. On appeal, the North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed the appellate court judgment. Heien appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Kagan, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Sotomayor, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.