Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Heights Realty, Ltd. v. Phillips

New Mexico Supreme Court
749 P.2d 77 (1988)


Facts

Heights Realty, Ltd. (Heights) (plaintiff) entered into an exclusive listing contract with Johnye Mary Gholson (Gholson) (original named defendant). In 1984, Gholson telephoned Pat Eichenberg, a real estate broker and the owner of Heights, to secure Heights’ services in selling Gholson’s property. At this time, Gholson was eighty-four years old. On September 26, 1984, Gholson signed a contract listing the property for one year at $250,000 with a $75,000 cash down payment. No other terms were included in the contract. On October 10, 1984, Gholson changed her mind about the down payment and signed an addendum increasing the down payment amount to $100,000. In November 1984, an offer was made to purchase Gholson’s property for $255,000. Gholson did not accept that offer. Heights brought suit against Gholson for the commission it allegedly earned for finding a buyer for Gholson’s property. During the proceedings, Gholson was adjudicated incompetent, and Phillips (defendant), Gholson’s son-in-law, was appointed conservator of her estate. At trial, Heights argued that the contract it made with Gholson was enforceable because she did not lack the mental capacity to contract at the time of contract formation. Based on testimony received from expert psychiatrist witnesses, Gholson’s relatives, and Gholson herself, the trial court held Gholson did not have the capacity to enter the leasing contract with Heights. The trial court thus held the contract invalid, and Heights appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Stowers, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.