Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Heim v. Fitzpatrick

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
262 F.2d 887 (1959)


Facts

Lewis Heim (plaintiff) applied for patents for a new product that he had invented. Heim then assigned his invention, along with any patents that might be issued for his invention or future improvements to his invention, to The Heim Company (Company). Heim’s patent applications were approved, and the patents were issued to the Company. Under his assignment agreement with the Company, Heim retained the right to receive certain royalty payments, reversionary rights to cancel the assignment, and decision-making rights related to future patents. Heim assigned these rights, including his reversionary interest in the patents, to his family members. Heim only paid federal gift taxes on the assignments to his family. Heim’s family members did not appear to be under Heim’s exclusive control or influence. The federal tax commissioner (commissioner) (defendant) determined a deficiency in Heim’s tax returns, concluding that Heim’s gross income should have included the royalty payments received by his family members. Heim petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination. Heim filed a motion summary judgment, which was denied. The tax court entered judgment in favor of the commissioner, holding that, under Helvering v. Eubank, 311 U.S. 122 (1940), the royalty payments that Heim assigned to his family members constituted gross income to Heim. Heim appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Swan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.