Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission
Missouri Supreme Court
859 S.W.2d 681 (1993)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Heins Implement Company and others (plaintiffs) owned property along Wakenda Creek. During heavy rainstorms, the creek would briefly flood the plaintiffs’ properties. The floodwaters would quickly recede and would never reach the plaintiffs’ homes and businesses. The Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission (MHTC) (defendant) condemned portions of the plaintiffs’ land to build a highway bypass along the creek. MHTC installed a culvert under the bypass. After its construction, the raised bypass acted as a dam and flooded the plaintiffs’ buildings, causing significant property damage. The culvert MHTC installed was insufficient to properly drain the bypass. The plaintiffs sued MHTC, claiming inverse condemnation and seeking damages. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs. MHTC filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The trial court granted the motion based on the common-enemy doctrine. The plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Price, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.