Heirs of Galen Roberts v. Coal Processing Corp.
Virginia Circuit Court
27 Va. Cir. 178, 1992 Va. Cir. LEXIS 168 (1992)
- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
In 1874, Galen Roberts entered an instrument regarding coal rights under a piece of property. Roberts had entered other instruments indicating that he knew how to properly sever the full mineral interest, as opposed to merely granting a lease. In the instrument at issue, the language conformed with Virginia’s law regarding leases in effect at the time. The instrument also used the term “lease” and set a term of 99 years. The instrument stated, however, that it was to “grant and convey.” The heirs of Roberts (heirs) (plaintiffs) and the Coal Processing Corporation (defendant) disputed the meaning of the instrument. Specifically, the heirs claimed that the instrument was a severance deed that gave them an interest in the coal, whereas Coal Processing claimed that the instrument was merely a limited-term lease.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mullins, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.