Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, S.A. v. Hall
United States Supreme Court
466 U.S. 408 (1984)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, S.A. (Helicol) (defendant), a Colombian corporation, is engaged in the business of providing helicopter transportation for oil and construction companies in South America. Helicol contracted with Consorcio, a Peruvian joint venture founded by Texans, to assist in the construction of a pipeline. Negotiations for the deal occurred in Texas. The contract stated that all lawsuits arising out of the transaction would be tried in Peruvian courts. Helicol purchased approximately 80 percent of its helicopter fleet from another Texas company named Bell Helicopter. Helicol paid roughly $4 million dollars to the Texas company for the helicopters and their accessories. Potential pilots for Helicol were periodically sent to Fort Worth, Texas to receive flight training from Bell Helicopter. Helicol’s management team was also sent to Texas for training. On January 26, 1976, a helicopter owned by Helicol crashed in Peru, killing four United States citizens. Hall (plaintiff) and other representatives of the four decedents filed a wrongful death suit in a district court in Texas. Helicol made a special appearance to argue that the court lacked personal jurisdiction. The Texas Supreme Court ruled that Texas had personal jurisdiction. Helicol then petitioned for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, and the case was granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.