Heller v. District of Columbia (Heller III)

801 F.3d 264 (2015)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Heller v. District of Columbia (Heller III)

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
801 F.3d 264 (2015)

Facts

In District of Columbia v. Heller (Heller I), 554 U.S. 570 (2008), the United States Supreme Court held that a District of Columbia (defendant) law prohibiting the holding and use of handguns for self-defense in the home was unconstitutional. The district’s city council then revised its gun laws by enacting a regulatory scheme with several new registration requirements. The regulatory scheme was again challenged by Dick Anthony Heller (plaintiff). The district defended the requirements on the ground that they helped (1) protect police officers and (2) promote public safety. The federal district court granted summary judgment in favor of the district, and Heller appealed. In Heller v. District of Columbia (Heller II), 670 F.3d 1254 (D.C. Cir. 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the basic registration requirements as they applied to handguns because of longstanding historical precedents. However, the court withheld a decision on the requirements’ constitutionality as applied to long guns. The case was remanded to the district court, which granted summary judgment in favor of the district and upheld the constitutionality of several requirements. These included requirements (1) involving registration of long guns, (2) that each firearm registrant appear in person to be fingerprinted and photographed, (3) that each registrant bring his firearm, (4) that registration be renewed every three years, (5) imposing certain fees for registration, (6) that each registrant complete a safety-and-training course, and (7) that only one pistol per person could be registered within a 30-day period. Heller again appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership