Helmicks v. Stevlingson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
212 Wis. 614, 250 N.W. 402 (1933)
- Written by Sarah Hoffman, JD
Facts
Helmicks (plaintiff) was employed by the Bank of Deerfield as the bank’s only cashier from October 1930 to January 1932, when the bank closed. The bank had been open since 1905. Stevlingson (defendant) had also been a cashier at the bank. After the bank closed, Stevlingson published a statement that the bank had been “loaned to death by the former cashier.” Helmicks sued Stevlingson for defamation on the grounds that the statement was intended to blame Helmicks for causing the bank to close by the way Helmicks had given out loans. Stevlingson filed a motion requesting that the case be dismissed. Stevlingson argued that Helmicks had not stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action because it was not ascertainable from the published statement to whom the statement was referring as “the former cashier.” The trial court denied Stevlingson’s motion. Stevlingson appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fritz, J.)
Dissent (Fowler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.