Helprin v. Harcourt, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
277 F. Supp. 2d 327 (2003)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Author Mark Helprin (plaintiff) and publisher Harcourt, Inc. (defendant) entered an agreement that called for Helprin to create five written works in exchange for an advance and future royalties. Harcourt reserved the right to reject a submitted work if Harcourt deemed the work to be below the literary standards of Helprin’s other works. However, the contract also called for Harcourt to provide editorial assistance if necessary to make a work acceptable prior to rejecting it. Both acceptance and rejection entailed formal notice to Helprin. Harcourt published the first work that Helprin submitted, but Helprin’s second manuscript was rejected, with a letter from Harcourt’s president stating that the work was unacceptable. No apparent editorial input was provided. Helprin filed a breach-of-contract complaint against Harcourt and Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. (HBJ) (defendant) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Helprin sought recission of the contract. Harcourt and HBJ moved for dismissal of the complaint.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marrero, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
