Helvering v. Bruun
United Stated Supreme Court
309 U.S. 461 (1940)
Charles Bruun (plaintiff) leased land and an old building to a tenant for a period of 99 years. The tenant was allowed to make improvements to the land, but the improvements would be forfeited back to Bruun if the lease was canceled at the tenant’s fault. The tenant removed the old building, constructed a new building, and subsequently failed to pay rent and taxes. Bruun received the property back, including the new building, which was valued about $50,000 higher than the old building. Guy Helvering, the commissioner of internal revenue (defendant), issued a deficiency notice against Bruun for failing to report any income resulting from the receipt of the property. Bruun sought a redetermination from the Board of Tax Appeals, which found for Bruun. The court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.