Helvering v. Eubank
United States Supreme Court
311 U.S. 122 (1940)
Eubank (plaintiff), a life-insurance agent, was promised future commissions on the renewal of insurance policies he initially sold. The value of those commissions would depend on the premiums eventually paid on the renewed policies by policyholders. In 1924 and 1928, Eubank assigned the rights to two of his commissions to a trustee. The trustee received the two commission payments in 1933. Guy Helvering, the commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant), determined that Eubank’s 1933 federal tax return should have included the two commissions as taxable income. Eubank petitioned the Board of Tax Appeals (Board) for review. The Board sustained the commissioner’s determination, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the Board’s decision. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stone, J.)
Dissent (McReynolds, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 687,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 687,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 43,000 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.