Hemenway v. Hemenway

992 A.2d 575 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hemenway v. Hemenway

New Hampshire Supreme Court
992 A.2d 575 (2009)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In July 2008, Michelle Hemenway (plaintiff) left her husband, Edmund Hemenway (defendant) and moved from Florida to New Hampshire. Michelle petitioned for a protective order against Edmund in the New Hampshire family-division court. In the petition, Michelle alleged that Edmund had been verbally abusive and had threatened her in both Florida and Massachusetts. The petition did not include allegations of incidents taking place in New Hampshire. The family division issued the protective order. The order prohibited Edmund from contacting, threatening, or coming near Michelle and required Edmund to surrender all weapons. Edmund appealed on the ground that the New Hampshire family division did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to issue the order. In support of his argument, Edmund alleged that the New Hampshire criminal court would not have jurisdiction over the same threatening behavior and so the family division should not have subject-matter jurisdiction either. Edmund also argued that the family division lacked personal jurisdiction over him.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Duggan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership