Hemlock Semiconductor Corporation v. Kyocera Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
747 Fed. App'x. 285 (2018)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Kyocera Corporation (defendant) contracted with Hemlock Semiconductor Corporation (Hemlock) (plaintiff) to buy polysilicon for 10 years. Kyocera covered the production’s initial setup costs. The contract contained take-or-pay provisions requiring Kyocera to take a particular quantity of polysilicon each year. Even if Kyocera did not take the full quantity each year, Kyocera still had to pay Hemlock the contract price for the listed quantity. This contract contained no makeup rights or otherwise gave Kyocera any future credits for payments made on undelivered polysilicon. When polysilicon prices dropped, Kyocera refused to take or pay for the listed polysilicon quantity at the contract price. Hemlock sued Kyocera in federal court, alleging that Kyocera had repudiated the contract. Kyocera counterclaimed that the contract’s pay option was an unenforceable penalty. The district court granted Hemlock’s motion to dismiss Kyocera’s counterclaim. Kyocera appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thapar, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.