Henderson v. Radio Corporation Pty. Ltd.
New South Wales Supreme Court
60 SR (NSW) 576, (1969) RPC 218 (1960)
- Written by Meredith Hamilton Alley, JD
Facts
The Hendersons (plaintiffs) were world-famous ballroom dancers from England who moved to Australia. The Hendersons gave ballroom-dancing performances, lectures, and demonstrations. Radio Corporation Pty. Ltd. (Radio Corp.) (defendant) published and sold a ballroom-dancing gramophone record called Strictly for Dancing. The cover of the record bore a photo of the Hendersons, who did not authorize the use of their image. The Hendersons sued Radio Corp. in a passing-off action in the High Court of New South Wales, alleging that the photo on the cover would mislead ballroom-dancing instructors, who were the target audience, into thinking that the Hendersons recommended the record. At trial, uncontradicted expert testimony established that the cover would mislead ballroom-dancing instructors. The court granted an injunction to the Hendersons that prohibited Radio Corp. from selling, distributing, or supplying copies of the record bearing the cover containing the Hendersons’ photo. Radio Corp. appealed, arguing that establishing the tort of passing off required the Hendersons to prove that they were involved in a common field of activity with Radio Corp., and that because Radio Corp. was a record publisher and distributor and the Hendersons were ballroom dancers and instructors, the two parties were not involved in a common field of activity.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Evatt, C.J., Myers, J.)
Concurrence (Manning, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.