Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Henley. v. Dillard Department Stores

United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
46 F. Supp. 2d 587 (1999)


Facts

Donald Henley (plaintiff) was a popular rock musician and former member of The Eagles. Dillard Department Stores (Dillard) (defendant) ran an advertisement for henley-style shirts that featured a play on words using Henley’s name. The advertisement showed a man wearing a henley-style shirt with the caption, “This is Don’s henley.” Henley sued Dillard for infringing on his right of publicity and other claims. Henley provided survey evidence indicating that 15 percent of respondents believed that Henley had endorsed the product. In deposition testimony, the advertisement’s designer stated that the advertisement was meant to be a play on words referencing Henley’s name and that she used Henley’s name to create an eye-catching advertisement. A Dillard’s vice-president testified that the words “Don’s henley” added no commercial value to the advertisement. Dillard argued that the reference to Henley was only incidental to the advertisement, which focused on the product itself. Dillard also argued that the advertisement provided no actual commercial benefit, because Dillard did not increase sales adequately to cover the cost of the ad campaign. Henley moved for partial summary judgment on the right of publicity claim.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Solis, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.