Hennagir v. Utah Department of Corrections

587 F.3d 1255 (2009)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hennagir v. Utah Department of Corrections

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
587 F.3d 1255 (2009)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 2001 the Utah Department of Corrections (the department) contracted with a company to provide retirement benefits. The company informed the department that all employees having direct contact with inmates had to complete a Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) and become POST certified. The department had previously considered requiring the POST certification, particularly after an employee was injured by an inmate and sued the department. However, the department did not adopt the policy until required to do so for the retirement-benefits program. The department explained its decision to implement the policy was to ensure employee safety in an emergency. In 2003 Barbara Hennagir (plaintiff), who was a physician’s assistant with the department for eight years, was informed that she would no longer keep her employment. Hennagir was unable to become certified due to several physical impairments. In response, Hennagir sued the department in federal district court under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Hennagir claimed that becoming POST certified was not an essential function of her job, particularly because the certification was not required when she was hired, she had been able to perform her job for years without the certification, and inmates rarely posed a danger. The district court granted summary judgment in the department’s favor. The matter was appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lucero, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 790,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership